Population and breeding dynamics of European Shags Phalacrocorax aristotelis at three major colonies in Shetland, 2001-15
* Correspondence author: firstname.lastname@example.org
1 SOTEAG, Aberdeen Institute of Coastal Science and Management, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen AB24 3UE, UK;
2 Foula Heritage, Magdala, Foula, Shetland ZE2 9PN, UK;
3 Fair Isle Bird Observatory Trust, Fair Isle, Shetland ZE2 9JU, UK.
In the 1998-2002 Seabird 2000 census, Shetland held 19% of the British and Irish breeding population of European Shags Phalacrocorax aristotelis (32,300 apparently occupied nests - AON), and the three largest colonies in Shetland (Fair Isle, Sumburgh Head and Foula) together held 44% of the total for the county. Subsequent monitoring at these colonies recorded substantial decreases in population size in 2004-05,2008 and 2011-13. This paper describes European Shag population and breeding dynamics at these three colonies for the period 2001-15, using annual monitoring data for six demographic parameters. Demographic changes were characterised by major reductions in breeding population size (AON), timing of breeding getting later, and considerable reductions in the percentages of nests that progressed to incubation and to hatching, and in overall breeding success. The 2004 and 2005 breeding seasons were exceptionally poor in Shetland but also at colonies elsewhere in north and east Scotland, apparently reflecting large-scale scarcity of sandeel Ammodytes prey. There was no such Scotland-wide (or Shetland-wide) uniformity in these breeding parameters in 2008 or 2011-13, when local food availability within foraging ranges of colonies appeared to be the main driver of European Shag breeding performance in Shetland. At Fair Isle, Sumburgh Head and Foula, breeding was markedly early in 2014 and 2015, and percentage incubation, percentage hatching and overall breeding success were all high. However, population sizes at these colonies remained low in 2014-15, with a combined deficit of c. 2,600 AON in comparison with the Seabird 2000 census figures. Possible mechanisms driving this situation, for example persistent non-breeding, emigration, or high mortality are evaluated. Given the high colony fidelity of European Shags once established as breeders, it is assumed these 'missing' birds are dead. Support for this assertion comes from the Shetland beached bird survey which indicated high mortality in late winter in 2003, 2011 and 2014, in the latter two years associated with prolonged gales. European Shag has recently been added to the UK Red list because of severe population decline, and continued (indeed enhanced) monitoring and ringing of the species is to be encouraged.
European Shags Phalacrocorax aristotelis (hereafter 'Shag') breed colonially along rocky coasts of the northeast Atlantic and the Mediterranean Sea. Although they build substantial nests, monitoring changes in breeding numbers and their breeding success is complicated by their asynchronous, lengthy and often variable breeding season, such that even a well-timed single count of nests is likely to record only about 75% of nesting attempts in a given year (Harris & Forbes 1987). In some years a substantial proportion of adults do not breed, which can result in an abrupt drop in nest numbers relative to previous years, and non-breeding can persist for several successive seasons (Aebischer 1986; Aebischer & Wanless 1992; Harris & Wanless 1996; Wanless & Harris 2004). Abrupt drops in counts of nests have also been recorded following oil spills (Heubeck 1997), weather-related winter mortality events (Harris & Wanless 1996; Harris et al. 1998; Frederiksen et al. 2008), or mortality events during the breeding season (Coulson et al. 1968).
The Seabird 2000 census recorded 32,306 apparently occupied nests (AON) of Shag in Britain and Ireland in 1998-2002, an estimated 40-45% of the world population (Wanless & Harris 2004). The largest concentration was in Shetland, which held 19% (6,147 AON) of the British and Irish total. The three largest colonies in Shetland, at the remote islands of Foula (2,277 AON; then the largest colony in Britain and Ireland, and one of the largest in the world) and Fair Isle (663 AON), and at Sumburgh Head at the southern tip of Mainland Shetland (270 AON), together held 44% of the Shetland total (Figure 1). At all three colonies, however, numbers had declined between the 1985-88 Seabird Colony Register and Seabird 2000 censuses, by 5% at Foula, 40% at Fair Isle, and 44% at Sumburgh Head.
Shag breeding success has been monitored at Fair Isle since 1986, Sumburgh Head since 1988, and Foula since 1997, and by 2000 each colony had averaged relatively high values of 1.42 ± 0.06 SE, 1.20 ± 0.08 SE, and 1.13 ± 0.22 SE chicks fledged per AON, respectively (Mavor et al. 2002). There was relatively low success at Fair Isle and Sumburgh Head in 1990, when the local abundance of Lesser Sandeels Ammodytes marinus was low (Walsh et al. 1991; Wright & Bailey 1993; Monaghan et al. 1997), and at Sumburgh Head and Foula in 2000, when nests were washed away by heavy seas in mid June (Mavor et al. 2001). Otherwise, Shags in Shetland seemed less susceptible to the food-related breeding failures experienced by species such as Black-legged Kittiwake Rissa tridactyla and Arctic Tern Sterna paradisaea (Monaghan et al. 1989; Harris & Wanless 1990; Monaghan et al. 1997; Heubeck et al. 1999), and by 2000 no major non-breeding events had been recorded at Fair Isle, Sumburgh Head or Foula.
This situation changed dramatically in 2004, when Shags largely deserted Foula during the breeding season (Mavor et al. 2005). In 2008, a similar crash in breeding numbers and a major breeding failure occurred at Fair Isle (Shaw et al. 2008). Then, in 2011, extensive non-breeding first became evident at Sumburgh Head (Heubeck & Mellor 2012; JNCC 2014).
Accordingly, this paper documents Shag population and breeding dynamics at these three Shetland colonies in 2001-15 using annual monitoring data for six demographic parameters, namely breeding population size (counts of AON), breeding phenology (median date chicks were first recorded at nests), the percentage of nest-building pairs that laid (percentage incubation, used as a measure of non-breeding), the percentage of incubating nests at which young were recorded (percentage hatched), the percentage of nests at which young were recorded from which at least one chick fledged (percentage fledged), and breeding success (chicks fledged per incubating nests). We quantify, test and compare temporal patterns of change in these parameters between and within the three colonies, make comparisons with Shag population changes recorded elsewhere in Shetland, and examine beached bird survey data from Shetland for evidence of abnormal mortality during this period.
Seabird monitoring on Fair Isle was funded by Fair Isle Bird Observatory Trust, with contributions from the Joint Nature Conservation Committee; thanks to all Fair Isle Bird Observatory staff members and volunteers in 2001-15 for data collection. SOTEAG monitoring is funded by the Sullom Voe Association Ltd; thanks to all who assisted with boat surveys, especially Billy Fox, Paul Harvey, Roger Riddington, Newton Harper and George Lamont Williamson. Afra Skene, Jonathan Swale and Glen Tyler (Scottish Natural Heritage), and Paul Harvey (Shetland Biological Records Centre) provided details of counts on Noss and Foula, while Rory Tallack and Andy Webb helped produce the figures. Drafts of the manuscript were greatly improved by comments from Mike Harris, Sarah Wanless and Andy Webb, and by referees Francis Daunt and Svein-Håkon Lorentsen.
Phalacrocorax aristotelis: a general method based on long-term marking. Journal of Animal Ecology 55: 613-629. [Crossref]Retrospective investigation of an ecological disaster in the Shag,
Phalacrocorax aristotelis on the east coast of Britain. Ibis 137: 11-18. [Crossref]Philopatry and colony fidelity of Shags
Phalacrocorax aristotelis at two British colonies. Ibis 137: 19-28. [Crossref]Site and mate fidelity of Shags
Phalacrocorax aristotelis on the Isle of May, Scotland. Bird Study 39: 43-52. [Crossref]Relationships between colony size, adult non-breeding and environmental conditions for Shags
Phalacrocorax aristotelis. Ibis 155: 762-778. [Crossref]Estimating dispersal distributions at multiple scales: within-colony and among-colony dispersal rates, distances and directions in European Shags
Phalacrocorax aristotelis over two decades: implications for marine spatial planning. Biological Conservation 140: 292-299. [Crossref]Among-year and within-population variation in foraging distribution of European shags
.British Birds 61: 381-404.Exceptional mortality of Shags and other seabirds caused by paralytic shellfish poisoning
Ecology 95: 2077-2083. [Crossref]Longitudinal bio-logging reveals interplay between extrinsic and intrinsic carry-over effects in a long-lived vertebrate.
British Birds 108: 708-746.Birds of Conservation Concern 4: the population status of birds in the UK, Channel Islands and Isle of Man.
Journal of Animal Ecology 77: 1020-1029. [Crossref]The demographic impact of extreme events: stochastic weather drives survival and population dynamics in a long-lived seabird.
Scottish Birds 11: 237-253.Seabird populations of Foula.
Seabird Report 6: 5-12.Population, breeding biology and diets of seabirds on Foula in 1980.
'Assessment of the status of seabirds on the island of Foula, Shetland'. Unpublished report, University of Glasgow.
'Seabird studies in Foula'. Unpublished annual reports, University of Glasgow.
Phalacrocorax aristotelis in northern Europe. Ornis Scandinavica 17: 68-74. [Crossref]Regional variations in the dispersal patterns of Shags
PLoS One 9: e98562. [Crossref]Site fidelity and individual variation in winter location in partially migratory European shags.
The Condor 96: 600-605.Year- and age-related variation in the survival of adult European Shags over a 24-year period.
Phalacrocorax aristotelis. Bird Study 34: 187-190.The effect of date on counts of nests of Shags
Scottish Birds 15: 119-125.The food of some young seabirds on Fair Isle in 1986-88.
Phalacrocorax aristotelis. In: Wernham, C. V., Toms, M. P., Marchant, J. H., Clark, J. A., Siriwardena, G. M. & Baillie, S. R. (eds.) The Migration Atlas: movements of the birds of Britain and Ireland [: 139-142. Poyser, London.European Shag (Shag)
Rissa tridactyla in 1986-88: evidence for changing conditions in the northern North Sea. Journal of Applied Ecology 27: 172-187. [Crossref]Breeding success of British Kittiwakes
Phalacrocorax aristotelis. Ornis Scandinavica 22: 375-382. [Crossref]The importance of the lesser sandeel Ammodytes marinus in the diet of the Shag
Phalacrocorax aristotelis during the chick-rearing period assessed by three methods. Bird Study 40: 135-139. [Crossref]The diet of Shags
Uria aalge and ShagPhalacrocorax aristotelis to a late winter wreck. Bird Study 43: 220-230. [Crossref]Differential responses of Guillemot
Phalacrocorax aristotelis. Ibis 140: 310-314. [Crossref]Age-related effects of a nonbreeding event and a winter wreck on the survival of Shags
'A census of the seabirds of Foula - June 2000'. Unpublished Report, SNH Lerwick.
The Impact of an Oil Spill in Turbulent Waters: The Braer : 73-90. The Stationery Office, Edinburgh.The Direct Effect of the Braer Oil Spill on Seabird Populations, and an Assessment of the Role of the Wildlife Response Centre. In: Davies, J. M. & Topping, G. (eds.)
'SOTEAG ornithological monitoring programme 2003 summary report'. Unpublished report to SOTEAG, Aberdeen.
Marine Ornithology 34: 123-127.The Shetland beached bird survey, 1979-2004.
Uria aalge chick diet and breeding performance at Sumburgh Head, Shetland in 2007-09, compared to 1990-91. Seabird 22: 9-18. [Crossref]Common Guillemot
Scottish Birds 34: 291-302.A photographic resurvey of seabird colonies on Foula, Shetland.
'SOTEAG ornithological monitoring programme 2011 summary report'. Unpublished report to SOTEAG, Aberdeen.
Rissa tridactyla breeding in Shetland, 1981-97. Bird Study 46: 48-61. [Crossref]Estimating the population size and rate of decline of Kittiwakes
Scottish Birds 11: 97-108. [Crossref]Bird mortality following the Esso Bernicia oil spill, Shetland, December 1978.
Seabird Population Trends and Causes of Change: 1986-2013 Report (http://www.jncc.defra.gov.uk/page-3201). Joint Nature Conservation Committee. Updated August 2014. Accessed 31 August 2014.
Seabird Population Trends and Causes of Change: 1986-2014 Report (http://www.jncc.defra.gov.uk/page-2877). Joint Nature Conservation Committee. Updated October 2015. Accessed 31 October 2015.
Seabird numbers and breeding success in Britain and Ireland, 2004. JNCC, Peterborough (UK Nature Conservation, No. 29).
Seabird numbers and breeding success in Britain and Ireland, 2005. JNCC, Peterborough (UK Nature Conservation, No. 30).
Seabird numbers and breeding success in Britain and Ireland, 2000. JNCC, Peterborough (UK Nature Conservation, No. 25).
Seabird numbers and breeding success in Britain and Ireland, 2001. JNCC, Peterborough (UK Nature Conservation, No. 26).
Journal of Animal Ecology 58: 261-274. [Crossref]The relationship between food supply, reproductive effort and breeding success in Arctic Terns Sterna paradisaea.
The Impact of an Oil Spill in Turbulent Waters: The Braer: 91-105. The Stationery Office, Edinburgh.Sublethal effects of the Braer oil spill on seabirds. In: Davies, J. M. & Topping, G. (eds).
Isle of May seabird studies in 2008. JNCC Report, No. 475d.
Phalacrocorax aristotelis (L.)). Journal of Animal Ecology 38: 53-102. [Crossref]The influence of eruptive movements, age, population size and other factors on the survival of the Shag (
'St Abb's Head NNR seabird report 2004'. Unpublished Report, National Trust for Scotland.
Fair Isle Bird Observatory Report for 2004. Fair Isle Bird Observatory Trust, Fair Isle.
'Fair Isle seabird studies 2008'. Unpublished FIBOT report to JNCC.
Marine Biology 161: 1335-1348. [Crossref]Factors affecting the foraging behaviour of the European shag: implications for seabird tracking studies.
Phalacrocorax aristotelis ring recovery and breeding success data during a period of population change on the Isle of Canna. Seabird 16: 50-56. [Crossref]An analysis of Shag
Phalacrocorax aristotelis, Black-legged Kittiwake Rissa tridactyla and Common Guillemot Uria aalge during the chick-rearing period 1981-2007. Seabird 21: 44-54.The diet of European Shag
Seabird monitoring handbook for Britain & Ireland. JNCC / RSPB / ITE / Seabird Group, Peterborough.
Seabird numbers and breeding success in 1990. Nature Conservancy Council CSD Report No. 1235.
'Breeding birds of the Farne Islands 2004'. Unpublished Report, The National Trust.
Phalacrocorax aristotelis. In: Mitchell, P. I., Newton, S. F., Ratcliffe, N. & Dunn, T. E. (eds.) Seabird Populations of Britain and Ireland: 146-159. Poyser, London.European Shag
Phalacrocorax aristotelis during chick rearing. Ibis 133: 30-36. [Crossref]Foraging range and feeding locations of Shags
Marine Ecology Progress Series 294: 1-8. [Crossref]Low energy values of fish as a probable cause of a major seabird breeding failure in the North Sea.
Biology of Sandeels in the Vicinity of Seabird Colonies at Shetland. Fisheries Research Report No. 15/93. SOAFD Marine Laboratory, Aberdeen.