Seabird Group Seabird Group

Kleptoparasitism in Common Guillemots Uria aalge at two colonies during a period of poor food availability

Ashbrook, K.1,4* ORCID logo, Wanless, S.2, Heubeck, M.3, Harris, M. P.2 and Hamer, K. C.1

https://doi.org/10.61350/sbj.24.83

1 Institute of Integrative and Comparative Biology, University of Leeds LS2 9JT, UK

2 Centre for Ecology & Hydrology, BushEstate, Penicuik, EH26 0QB,UK

3 Aberdeen Institute for Coastal Science & Management, University of Aberdeen, c/o Sumburgh Head Lighthouse, Virkie, Shetland ZE3 9JN, UK

4 Present address: Department of Biology & Biochemistry, University of Bath, BA2 7AY, UK

Full paper

Abstract

Kleptoparasitism, the stealing of food items from other animals, is an important foraging strategy for many taxa. In many cases the kleptoparasites and hosts are different species but less commonly, prey items are stolen from conspecifics. Recent studies have highlighted the potential importance of intra-specific kleptoparasitism in food-stressed populations, and here we show facultative kleptoparasitism at two North Sea colonies of Common Guillemots Uria aalge during one year of poor breeding success and one year of near average breeding success. The frequency of kleptoparasitism differed between colonies and years, reflecting variation in the magnitude of the benefits from kleptoparasitism, which was probably associated with variation in prey availability at sea. Specialised foraging strategies such as kleptoparasitism may allow individuals to buffer adverse conditions more effectively than those foraging only at sea.

Introduction

Kleptoparasitism, the stealing of food items from other animals, is a common behaviour recorded in many seabird species (Furness 1987). It can sometimes involve high energy expenditure and risk of injury (Furness 1987; Sirot 2000), and so may be beneficial to individuals only during food shortages (Oro 1996; Sirot 2000). Facultative kleptoparasitism occurs in many groups of birds and is an important feeding technique in several families of seabirds (Lavers & Jones 2007), although in some cases it may be a specialised behaviour shown in only a small proportion of individuals (Steele & Hockey 1995; Shealer & Spendelow 2002).

Common Guillemots Uria aalge (hereafter ‘Guillemots’) are not kleptoparasitic under normal feeding conditions but during periods of food-stress (e.g. during El Niño events), adults have been recorded stealing prey from small or satiated chicks (Ainley et al. 2002) and from other adults (Furness 1987). Recently, breeding success at Guillemot colonies bordering the North Sea has been poor (Mavor et al. 2005; Wanless et al. 2005; Heubeck 2009) and under these circumstances, kleptoparasites may profit from stealing food for their chicks. Changes in the social behaviour of this species have already been observed in response to poor food availability, with parents able to increase chick-provisioning rate by leaving their chick unattended at the colony and foraging simultaneously (Ashbrook et al. 2010). Here, we quantify the occurrence of kleptoparasitism under such conditions in two widely separated populations.

Acknowledgements

We thank Mark Newell, Francis Daunt and Sue Lewis for help and advice with Isle of May data collection, Scottish Natural Heritage for allowing us to work on the Isle of May National Nature Reserve and Larisa Lee Cruz for valuable discussion and comments. K.A. was supported by a NERC PhD studentship. Research was conducted in compliance with the appropriate Scottish Natural Heritage Licence. The seabird monitoring at Sumburgh Head was carried out under contract to the Shetland Oil Terminal Environmental Advisory Group, funded by the Sullom Voe Association Ltd.

References

Ainley, D. G., Nettleship, D. N., Carter, H. R. & Storey, A. E. 2002. Common Murre (Uria aalge). In: Poole, A. & Gill, F. (eds.) The Birds of North America. Philadelphia, PA. [Crossref]

Ashbrook, K., Wanless, S., Harris, M. P. & Hamer, K. C. 2010. Impacts of poor food availability on positive density dependence in a highly colonial seabird. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 277: 2355–2360. [Crossref]

Ashbrook, K., Wanless, S., Harris, M. P. & Hamer, K. C. 2008. Hitting the buffers: conspecific aggression undermines benefits of colonial breeding under adverse conditions. Biology Letters 4: 630–633. [Crossref]

Crawley, M. J. 2007. The R Book. John Wiley & Sons Ltd, New York.

Furness, R. W. 1987. Kleptoparasitism in seabirds. In: Croxall, J. P. (ed.) Seabirds: feeding ecology and role in marine ecosystems: 77–100. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

Harris, M. P. & Wanless, S. 1985. Fish fed to young guillemots, Uria aalge, and used in display on the Isle of May, Scotland. Journal of Zoology 207: 441–458. [Crossref]

Heubeck, M. 2009. Common Guillemot Uria aalge chick diet and breeding performance at Sumburgh Head, Shetland in 2007–2009, compared to 1990–1991. Seabird 22: 8–18. [Crossref]

Lavers, J. L. & Jones, I. L. 2007. Impacts of intraspecific kleptoparasitism and diet on Razorbill Alca torda productivity at the Gannet Island, Labrador. Marine Ornithology 7: 1–7.

Mavor, R. A., Parsons, M., Heubeck, M. & Schmitt, S. 2005. Seabird numbers and breeding success in Britain and Ireland, 2004. Joint Nature Conservation Committee, Peterborough. (UK Nature Conservation, No. 29.)

Monaghan, P., Walton, P., Wanless, S., Uttley, J. D. & Burns, M. D. 1994. Effects of prey abundance on the foraging behaviour, diving efficiency and time allocation of breeding Guillemots Uria aalge. Ibis 136: 214–222. [Crossref]

Newell, M., Harris, M. P., Quinn, L., Wanless, S. & Daunt, F. 2008. ‘Isle of May seabird studies 2008’. Unpublished Report. JNCC, Peterborough / CEH, Banchory.

Orians, G. H. & Pearson, N. E. 1979. On the theory of central place foraging. In: Horn, D. J., Stairs, G. R., Mitchell, R. D. (eds.) Analysis of ecological systems: 154–177. Ohio State University Press, Columbus.

Oro, D. 1996. Interspecific kleptoparasitism in Audouin’s Gull Larus audouinii at the Ebro Delta, northeast Spain: a behavioural response to low food availability. Ibis 138: 218–221. [Crossref]

R Development Core Team. 2007. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, http://www.R-project.org.

Shealer, D. A. & Spendelow, J. A. 2002. Individual foraging strategies of kleptoparasitic Roseate Terns. Waterbirds 25: 436–441. [Crossref]

Shealer,D.A., Spendelow, J.A., Hatfield, J.S. & Nisbet,I.C.T. 2005.The adaptive significance of stealing in a marine bird and its relationship to parental quality. Behavioral Ecology 16: 371–376. [Crossref]

Sirot, E. 2000. An evolutionarily stable strategy for aggressiveness in feeding groups. Behavioral Ecology 11: 351–356. [Crossref]

Steele, W. K. & Hockey, P. A. R. 1995. Factors influencing rate and success of intraspecific kleptoparasitism among Kelp Gulls. The Auk 112: 847–859. [Crossref]

Thaxter, C. B., Daunt, F., Hamer, K. C., Watanuki, Y. & Harris, M. P. 2009. Sex-specific food provisioning in a monomorphic seabird, the Common Guillemot Uria aalge: nest defence, foraging efficiency or parental effort? Journal of Avian Biology 40: 75–84. [Crossref]

Tschanz, B. 1968. Trottellummen. Zeitschrift für Tierpsychologie, Suppl. vol. 4: 1–103.
Woo, K. J., Elliott, K. H., Davidson, M., Gaston, A. J. & Davoren, G. K. 2008. Individual specialization in diet by a generalist marine predator reflects specialization in foraging behaviour. Journal of Animal Ecology 77: 1082–1091. [Crossref]